How to File PCT National Phase in Japan

Introduction

Filing a PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) national phase application in Japan is a crucial step for companies and inventors seeking intellectual property protection in one of the world's most technologically advanced and legally structured markets. With Japan’s rigorous yet reliable examination process, a clear understanding of the procedures and legal requirements can significantly influence the outcome of your application. This comprehensive guide outlines the critical stages of national phase entry in Japan, offering actionable steps and strategic insights to help applicants navigate the process effectively.

Understanding the PCT and Japan’s National Phase Entry

The PCT system enables applicants to file a single international patent application that has the effect of a national application in each designated contracting state. Japan, as a full member of the PCT, allows national phase entry under specific rules governed by the Japan Patent Office (JPO).

In most cases, the national phase entry must occur within 30 months from the earliest priority date. While Japan does allow for restoration of the right of entry in limited circumstances (e.g., unintentional delay), this is not guaranteed. Early preparation and careful tracking of deadlines are essential to avoid loss of rights.

Why Choose Japan for Patent Protection?

Japan remains one of the top three patent-filing countries in the world, known for its cutting-edge industries, including automotive, electronics, semiconductors, materials science, and biotechnology. The country’s mature IP infrastructure and strong enforcement mechanisms make it a strategic jurisdiction for global patent coverage.

Securing patents in Japan not only provides legal protection but also enhances a company’s reputation in the Japanese and broader Asian markets. Patents granted by the JPO carry considerable weight in negotiations, licensing, and enforcement, both domestically and internationally.

Step-by-Step Guide to PCT National Phase Entry in Japan

Step 1: Confirm Eligibility and Priority Dates

Confirm that the 30-month period from the earliest priority date has not expired. Late entry may be possible under Article 184(4) of the Japanese Patent Act, but only if the delay is deemed unintentional and a petition is filed with supporting documentation and official fees.

Step 2: Choose a Qualified Japanese Agent

Foreign applicants must appoint a registered Japanese patent attorney (Benrishi) to act before the JPO. Selecting a knowledgeable and responsive agent is essential for ensuring procedural accuracy and smooth communication. Origami International Patent Firm specializes in representing overseas applicants and offers fixed-fee services to reduce uncertainty and cost.

Step 3: Prepare Required Documents

The following documents are required for national phase entry:

  • Request for national phase entry (based on Form 53)
  • Japanese translation of the full specification, including:
    • Claims
    • Description
    • Abstract
    • Drawings (if applicable)
  • Priority document(s) (if not already submitted via WIPO)
All documents must reflect the most recent amendments filed during the international phase, if applicable.

Step 4: Translate Documents Accurately

Translation quality is critical, as Japanese patent examiners rely heavily on the wording of the Japanese claims and description. Poor or inconsistent translation can lead to rejections, narrowed claims, or enforceability issues. Origami International Patent Firm offers expert translation services by patent professionals for just 30 JPY per English word.

Step 5: Submit Application to the JPO

Once all documents are prepared and translated, the national phase entry is submitted to the JPO. Our flat-fee package of JPY 43,000 includes the preparation and electronic filing of the entry, notifications, and procedural monitoring. Additional services, such as early publication requests, priority certificate procurement, and claim amendments, are available upon request.

Step 6: Examination and Office Actions

A request for substantive examination must be filed within three years from the international filing date. This request can be made at the time of national entry or anytime before the three-year deadline. If the examiner raises objections, an Office Action will be issued. Applicants must respond within the designated time, typically 60 days (extendable), with appropriately reasoned amendments or arguments.

Advantages of Working with Origami International Patent Firm

Our firm offers unparalleled support tailored for overseas applicants, especially startups, individual inventors, and SMEs looking for cost-effective entry into the Japanese market. Key advantages include:

  • Flat-fee pricing: Our all-inclusive national phase entry package starts at JPY 43,000 (approximately USD 300), which covers filing preparation, attorney representation, and procedural monitoring — a fraction of the market average (USD 600–1,200 in Japan).
  • Translation support: High-quality technical translations by subject-matter experts are available at just JPY 30 per English word, significantly reducing translation costs without compromising accuracy.
  • Fast turnaround time: Standard filing is completed within 48 business hours upon receipt of required documents.
  • Direct communication in English: All correspondence is handled by English-speaking patent professionals to ensure smooth and timely communication.
  • Post-filing support: We assist with claim amendments, divisional applications, and Office Action responses at transparent, fixed fees.
Compared to traditional Japanese firms, our streamlined model offers up to 50–70% cost savings for initial national entry, while maintaining professional quality and responsiveness.

For detailed service offerings, visit: Origami International Patent Firm – PCT/Paris Entry into Japan

Strategic Tips for In-House Counsel

Best practices for corporate IP teams managing Japanese national phase entries include:

  • Integrate Japanese deadlines into your global docketing system.
  • Begin translation and attorney selection 3–4 months in advance.
  • Assign a single point of contact for communication with the Japanese agent.
  • Ensure inventor declarations, assignments, and legal documents are complete before entry.
  • Budget for examination and post-grant procedures, including appeals if necessary.

Conclusion

Filing a PCT national phase application in Japan is a strategic move for any company seeking robust patent protection in Asia. By understanding the legal framework, preparing thoroughly, and collaborating with a reliable and experienced partner like Origami International Patent Firm, you can reduce costs, expedite timelines, and secure valuable patent rights in Japan’s competitive market.

Contact Information

*We would appreciate it if you could set up the domain for @origamipatentfirm.com, regarding the above your email address. If not, our email might end up in the spam folder.

FYI: Competitive Fee Schedule

Compared to a typical Japanese patent firm, Origami International Patent Firm offers highly competitive and transparent pricing tailored to overseas applicants.

This means that applicants working with Origami can typically expect 50–70% total cost savings compared to conventional Japanese firms, without compromising on quality, responsiveness, or technical accuracy.

Item For Patent Application Typical Firm (Service Fee) Origami Firm (Service Fee)
PCT or Paris Extension into JP or
Regular Filing in JP
100,000 JPY All-inclusive price 43,000 JPY
(about 300 USD)
Filing an amendment based on Art. 19 30,000 JPY
Filing an amendment based on Art. 34 30,000 JPY
Filing a voluntary amendment 30,000 JPY
Claiming priority to one or more prior applications 10,000- JPY
Filing a request for examination 20,000 JPY 15,000 JPY
(about 100 USD)
PPH (excluding a request for examination) 80,000 JPY 60,000 JPY
(about 400 USD)
Filing a priority certificate in the absense of DAS code (*1) 20,000 JPY 15,000 JPY
(about 100 USD)
Translation of each procedural document (*2) 40 JPY/EN Word 30 JPY/EN Word
Response to an Office action (*3) 200,000 or more JPY Workload A: 40,000 JPY (*4)
Workload B: 80,000 JPY (*4)
Workload C: 120,000 JPY (*4)
Workload D: 160,000 JPY (*4)
Workload E: 180,000- JPY (*4)
Filing a Divisional Application 80,000 JPY 60,000 JPY
(about 400 USD)
Reporting a notice of allowance and paying the registration fee (1st to 3rd year in lump sum as registration fee) 50,000 JPY 28,000 JPY
(about 180 USD)
Payment of annuity 30,000 JPY 15,000 JPY
(about 100 USD)

*1. Regarding "Filing a priority certificate in the absence of DAS code", the certificate and DAS code are issued by the Patent Office after a precedent application was filed. Furthermore, one of them is required only when you claim a priority based on the precedent application in Japan. In other words, they are not required if there is no precedent application.

*2. Regarding "Translation of each procedural document", we will charge a translation fee regarding specifications including a description, claims, abstract, and drawings which are needed to file with the JPO. Regarding an office action, we will charge the translation fee thereof if you request us to translate it from Japanese to English for studying it on your side. In other words, we do not charge when you prefer not to translate the office action.

*3. Response to an office action issued by the JPO, an amendment and argument are prepared for responding to it and for arguing that the concerned application should be registered. Please note that the office action is not necessarily issued, it is issued only when there is the reason for rejection regarding a registration of a Patent/Design/Trademark application, the reason being Novelty, Inventive Step, and the like. In other words, we do not charge when there is no office action or when you prefer not to respond to the issued office action.

*4. Regarding our service fee for responding to the office action, it is specified based on from "Workload A" to "Workload E". These workloads depend on degree of difficulty for overcoming the reason for rejection and/or the number of the reasons described therein.
The "Workload A" is, for example, a task of deleting a part of claims;
The "Workload B" is, for example, a task of preparing a comment for overcoming the office action;
The "Workload C" is, for example, a task of preparing and filing a response to the office action;
The "Workload D" is, for example, a task of preparing a comment for overcoming the office action and filing a response thereto; and
The "Workload E" is, for example, an additional or extra task in addition to the "Workload D".

Comments on this post

No comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA


Trackbacks and Pingbacks on this post

No trackbacks.

TrackBack URL